When you open the test, tips (or rules) are provided for each question at the top of the page. Correct answers are included at the end of the test. From the following four options, select the answer that best corrects the underlined error before the question number. If there is no error or if the original text is the best option, select “NO CHANGE”. Choose the correct form of the verb that corresponds to the subject. In the four examples below, the verbs are in bold. In any case, a help verb comes before the subject, while the rest of the verb follows the subject. The subject is therefore located between the two parts of the verb, and the structure is verb + subject + verb: 20. The Johnson committee (debates, pronunciation) has only one show with several episodes, and so the error is a subject-verb agreement problem that can only be solved with “show is”. Remember that the subject number of the sentence (plural or singular) is never changed by the words placed between the subject and the verb of the sentence. Read the questions carefully and choose the right verb. The correct verb corresponds to the subject. If you take enough time and learn how to best apply each “rule” or “clue” to the corresponding question, you will be able to find the right answer to all the questions.

You can take this practical test as many times as you want. You can repeat this practice test until you manage to apply all the subject-verb match rules in these questions. A. Instructions for use: Choose the correct verb in these sentences. This is a practical “learning” test. All questions are accompanied by a “hint” or “rule” that accompanies the question. In instructions, the usual sentence structure is subject + verb. However, the questions are organized slightly differently. In a question, at least part of the verb comes before the subject. If you found a problem with this question, please let us know.

With the help of the community, we can continue to improve our educational resources. One of the most popular programs of all those presented on the Internet (1) is a music video show. The format of the show is simple, every (2) weeks the host, a short but attractive New Yorker named John Jackson, (3) presents a series of three video clips from all over the Internet. These clips show (4) people injured in accidents, finding themselves in crazy situations, stupidly interacting with animals, etc. (5) Jackson introduces each clip in a fun way and often comments on the action with animations in which (6) he makes fun of the people in the videos. Although the videos are often funny, there is definitely an element of schadenfreude when watching these clips. Schadenfreude is a German word for “the joy one has to see the suffering of others”. (7) Jackson`s show (8) is (9) not far from popular television programs like (10) The U.S. Laughs at You there is also a version of it (11) on the Internet.

It`s an open question about whether laughing at these videos is harmless activity or hurts us. (12) These subject-verb matching exercises with answers cover both simple topics and composite topics that use “and” or “or” to connect individual topics. Here is the article to finish all the articles on a subject-verb correspondence: 20 rules of the subject-verb agreement. Students will be able to take quiz after quiz by learning these rules. The error is the subject-verb match, so the correct answer should be, “These clips are displayed.” The student whose hand was raised (1) gave the wrong answer. She was asked what a substantive adjective (2) was, and she replied that a substantial adjective is an adjective that (3) describes a substance. “No!” (4) the teacher barked. “A substantial adjective replaces a noun in a sentence, as if someone were talking about rich and poor (5). Did you not learn anything in this course? He then asked what a superlative adjective was, to which she replied (6) that a superlative adjective was an adjective that replaced a noun in a sentence.

“But that`s (7) what I just said,” the professor shouted! (8) The student had said (9) that she had heard him, so (10) she had answered his question. “You answered my question earlier, (11),” he roars, “not the last!” “Ah, you mean the last,” the student replied, just as (12) the teacher turned to the wall and began to hit his head against him. If you`re looking for a subject-verb match quiz, here are two for you. The first set of questions is fundamental and covers simple and composite topics with singular nouns or pronouns and verbs that must correspond depending on whether they are singular or plural. The second quiz covers composite topics, complex sentences, and special nouns that assume singular verbs. When it comes to religions, it is particularly easy to distinguish between orders that are too questionable. Each religious phenomenon has its history and derivation from natural precursors. What is now called the superior critique of the Bible is only a study of the Bible from this existential point of view, which has been too neglected by the ancient Church.

Under what biographical conditions did the holy writers produce their various contributions to the sacred volume? What exactly did they have in their different minds when they made their statements? These are obviously questions of historical facts, and it is not clear how the answer to them can casually decide the following question: to what should such a volume, with its thus defined way of being created, be for us as a guide to life and as a revelation? To answer this other question, we must already have in our minds some kind of general theory about what the peculiarities of a thing should be that give it value for the purposes of revelation; and this theory itself would be what I have just called a spiritual judgment. If we combine it with our existential judgment, we could indeed draw a different spiritual judgment about the value of the Bibles. Thus, if our theory of the value of revelation asserted that every book, in order to possess it, must have been written automatically or not by the free whim of the writer, or that it must not contain scientific and historical errors and express local or personal passions, the Bible would probably function badly in our hands. But if, on the other hand, our theory were to allow a book to be a revelation despite mistakes, passions, and conscious human composition, if it were only a true record of the inner experiences of people with great souls struggling with the crises of one`s destiny, then the verdict would be very favorable. They see that existential facts alone are not enough to determine value; and the best followers of higher criticism never confuse the existential with the spiritual problem. With the same factual conclusions awaiting them, some take one view and others another of the value of the Bible as revelation, as their spiritual judgment on the basis of values differs. So you can understand why the question that concerns us takes two related, albeit different, forms. Today we ask, “What are the relationships between metaphysics and physical theory?” In recent days, however; in fact, for almost two thousand years; Instead, it was phrased as follows: “What are the relationships between physics and astronomy?” The original choice of word is the only noun-verb pairing that correctly associates the singular “type” with the underlined part. Remember: all connected nouns in a noun or clause must match, singular or plural.

However, there are issues that involve collective nouns, and a number of students have serious problems when dealing with collective nouns in relation to the subject-verb agreement. The main problem with the sentence, as it is written, is that the subject and verb do not match in number. The main sentence of the sentence reads: “The study […] were.. The prepositional expression “of material realities” modifies the subject – “study” – which is singular. The tense must remain in the past, so the best option is the one that changes the verb to be singluar while remaining in the past – that is, “was”. The phrase “the one who describes” is the only one that maintains the correct subject-verb correspondence and also corresponds to the rest of the sentence. The verb in this sentence must correspond to the sentence that follows it, which is a list of plural nouns; Therefore, the phrase “there was not enough” is the most appropriate. What are physical theories worth? What is the relationship with metaphysical explanation? These are issues that are strongly affected and raised today. As with other issues, however, they are by no means completely new. This is a question that has been asked in all age groups. .